FlavScents AInsights Entry for Dihydrojasmone Lactone (CAS: 7011-83-8)

1. Identity & Chemical Information

• Common Name(s): Dihydrojasmone lactone
• IUPAC Name: 3-(3-oxo-2-pentylcyclopentyl)propanoic acid
• CAS Number: 7011-83-8
• FEMA Number: Not available
• Other Identifiers: Not available
• Molecular Formula: C13H22O2
• Molecular Weight: 210.32 g/mol
• Functional Groups and Structure–Odor Relevance: Dihydrojasmone lactone is characterized by a lactone ring, which contributes to its creamy, floral, and slightly fruity odor profile. The cyclopentyl group enhances its stability and diffusion in formulations.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA

2. Sensory Profile

• Odor and Flavor Descriptors: Dihydrojasmone lactone is known for its creamy, floral, and slightly fruity aroma. It is often described as having a jasmine-like scent with nuances of coconut and peach.
• Taste and/or Odor Thresholds: Specific thresholds are not clearly reported, but it is generally used in low concentrations due to its potent aroma.
• Typical Sensory Role: It serves as an impact note in fragrance compositions and can add depth and complexity to flavor systems.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature

3. Natural Occurrence & Formation

• Known Natural Sources: Dihydrojasmone lactone is not typically found in nature but can be synthesized for use in flavors and fragrances.
• Formation Pathways: It is primarily produced through chemical synthesis, involving the cyclization of appropriate precursors.
• Relevance to “Natural Flavor” or “Natural Fragrance” Designation: As a synthetic compound, it does not qualify for natural designations unless derived from natural precursors through permissible processes.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs

4. Use in Flavors

• Flavor Categories and Applications: Commonly used in fruit and floral flavor profiles, particularly in peach, apricot, and tropical fruit applications.
• Functional Role in Flavor Systems: Acts as a modifier to enhance creamy and floral notes, providing a rich and full-bodied character.
• Typical Use Levels: Industry-typical use levels range from 0.1 to 5 ppm in finished products, depending on the desired intensity.
• Stability Considerations: Dihydrojasmone lactone is relatively stable under normal processing conditions but may degrade under extreme heat or acidic conditions.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature

5. Use in Fragrances

• Fragrance Families and Product Types: Widely used in floral, fruity, and gourmand fragrance families. Suitable for use in perfumes, lotions, and personal care products.
• Functional Role: Serves as a middle note, providing creamy and floral nuances that enhance the overall fragrance profile.
• Typical Concentration Ranges: Typically used at concentrations of 0.1% to 1% in fragrance formulations.
• Volatility and Top/Middle/Base Contribution: Contributes primarily as a middle note due to its moderate volatility.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts

6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)

• United States (FDA / FEMA GRAS): Not explicitly listed as GRAS by FEMA.
• European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; FL Number Status): Not specifically listed; use subject to general safety assessments.
• United Kingdom (Post-Brexit Alignment or Divergence): Follows EU regulations unless otherwise specified.
• Asia (Japan, China, ASEAN): Regulatory status varies; typically requires safety assessment for use.
• Latin America (e.g., Brazil, MERCOSUR): Subject to regional safety and regulatory evaluations.

Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications

7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations

• Oral Exposure: Data not found for specific ADI or MSDI values. Generally considered safe at low concentrations typical in flavor applications.
• Dermal Exposure: No significant irritation or sensitization reported at typical use levels in fragrances.
• Inhalation Exposure: Low volatility reduces inhalation risk; occupational exposure should follow standard safety practices.
• Risk Profiles: Similar safety profiles for both food and fragrance applications, with no significant differences noted.

Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature

8. Practical Insights for Formulators

• Why This Material is Valuable: Offers a unique creamy and floral profile that enhances both flavors and fragrances.
• Typical Synergies: Pairs well with other floral and fruity notes, such as jasmine, peach, and coconut.
• Common Formulation Pitfalls: Overuse can lead to an overpowering scent; balance is key.
• Situations Where It is Frequently Over- or Under-used: Often under-used in complex formulations where its subtlety can be lost.

Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice

9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes

• Well-Established Data: Sensory characteristics and typical use levels are well-documented.
• Industry-Typical but Undocumented Practices: Some use levels and applications are based on industry norms rather than formal studies.
• Known Data Gaps or Regulatory Ambiguities: Lack of specific regulatory listings in some regions may require additional safety assessments.

Citation hooks: FlavScents

QA Check

• All required sections 1–9 are present
• “Citation hooks:” line is present under each section
• Flavor section includes ppm ranges
• Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
• Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
• If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)

About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.

Generated 2026-03-23 10:10:21 GMT (p2)