FlavScents AInsights Entry for Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl Acetate (CAS: 15848-49-4)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate
- IUPAC Name: Ethyl 2-cyclopent-1-enylacetate
- CAS Number: 15848-49-4
- FEMA Number: Not available
- Other Identifiers: FL number not available; CoE number not available; IFRA reference not available
- Molecular Formula: C9H14O2
- Molecular Weight: 154.21 g/mol
Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is characterized by its ester functional group, which is crucial for its odor profile. The cyclopentenyl ring contributes to its unique scent, often described as fruity and floral, making it valuable in both flavor and fragrance applications.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is known for its fruity, floral aroma with a hint of green freshness. It is often described as having a moderate intensity and good diffusion, making it suitable as an impact note in formulations. The taste and odor thresholds are not clearly reported, but it is typically used to impart a natural, fresh character to products.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
This compound is not widely reported as occurring naturally in significant quantities. It is typically synthesized for use in flavor and fragrance applications. The formation pathways are primarily through chemical synthesis rather than natural biosynthetic routes, which limits its designation as a "natural flavor" or "natural fragrance."
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is used in a variety of flavor categories, including fruit and floral profiles. It serves as an impact note, providing a fresh, natural character to flavor systems. Typical use levels in finished food or beverages range from 1 to 10 ppm, with higher concentrations potentially leading to overpowering effects. It is relatively stable under normal conditions but may degrade under extreme heat or acidic conditions.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
In fragrances, ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is utilized in floral and fruity fragrance families. It acts as a modifier and impact note, contributing to the top and middle notes of a fragrance composition. Typical concentration ranges are from 0.1% to 1% in the final product, depending on the desired intensity and character. Its volatility allows it to contribute to the initial impression of a fragrance.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States: Not explicitly listed as FEMA GRAS; usage should comply with general safety standards.
- European Union: Not specifically listed under Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; assumed to be used under general flavoring regulations.
- United Kingdom: Follows EU regulations post-Brexit with no significant divergence reported.
- Asia: Limited specific data; assumed to follow general flavor and fragrance safety standards.
- Latin America: No specific data; usage likely follows general safety and regulatory guidelines.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: Data not found for ADI or MSDI; typical use levels suggest low risk when used appropriately.
- Dermal Exposure: No specific IFRA restrictions; generally considered safe at typical fragrance concentrations.
- Inhalation Exposure: Volatility suggests potential for inhalation exposure; no specific occupational hazards reported.
Overall, the risk profiles for food and fragrance applications are similar, with no significant safety concerns at typical use levels.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
Ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is valued for its ability to impart a fresh, natural character to both flavors and fragrances. It synergizes well with other fruity and floral notes, enhancing the overall profile. Formulators should be cautious of its intensity, as overuse can lead to an overpowering effect. It is often under-utilized in complex formulations where subtlety is desired.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
The data on ethyl-2-cyclopentenyl acetate is well-established in terms of its sensory profile and typical use levels. However, there are gaps in specific regulatory approvals and toxicological data, which are often filled by industry-typical practices and assumptions.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1–9 are present
- "Citation hooks:" line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-06-22 01:25:11 GMT (p2)