The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material, specifically focusing on citrus grandis peel oil (CAS: 8016-20-4). This prompt is designed for use by a technical research assistant contributing to FlavScents.com, a specialized resource for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry. Below is a breakdown of the key components and requirements of the prompt:

Key Components of the Prompt

1. Material Type Handling:

   • The material is identified as a natural complex material, which means it should be treated as a mixture rather than a single molecule. This affects how the identity and chemical information are presented.

2. Depth Requirement:

   • The entry must be comprehensive, with a target length of 1100-1700 words for complex natural materials. Each section should be detailed, with a target of 120-220 words per section.

3. Output Format:

   • The entry should be structured with specific numbered headings, each corresponding to a section that must be included in the final output.

4. Citation Hooks:

   • Each section must include a "Citation hooks:" line, listing relevant sources to consult. These are placeholders for linking to authoritative sources.

5. Quality Assurance:

   • A final "QA Check" section is required to ensure all sections are present, citation hooks are included, and specific requirements (such as ppm ranges in the flavor section) are met.

Sections to Include

1. Identity & Chemical Information:

   • Common names, CAS number, and other identifiers.
   • Description of the material type and source.

2. Sensory Profile:

   • Odor and flavor descriptors, including intensity and typical sensory roles.

3. Natural Occurrence & Formation:

   • Known natural sources and formation pathways.

4. Use in Flavors:

   • Flavor categories, applications, and typical use levels in ppm.

5. Use in Fragrances:

   • Fragrance families, functional roles, and concentration ranges.

6. Key Constituents (Typical):

   • List of major or character-impact constituents, noting variability.

7. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview):

   • Summary of regulatory treatment in various regions.

8. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations:

   • Safety in the context of oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure.

9. Practical Insights for Formulators:

   • Expert insights on the material's value, synergies, and common pitfalls.

10. Confidence & Data Quality Notes:

    • Summary of data quality and known gaps.

11. QA Check:

    • Checklist confirming all requirements are met.

Style & Constraints

• The entry should be written for experienced professionals, avoiding marketing language and focusing on interpretive insights rather than encyclopedic repetition.

This structured approach ensures that the entry is both comprehensive and technically accurate, providing valuable information for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry.

About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.

Generated 2026-02-13 14:05:59 GMT (p2)