The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material, specifically cyclohexyl acetate (CAS: 622-45-7), for FlavScents.com. This prompt is designed for a technical research assistant and emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and relevance in formulation and safety contexts. Here's a breakdown of the key components and requirements:
Key Components:
-
Material Type Handling:
- The prompt distinguishes between single chemical compounds and complex natural materials, providing specific instructions for each type.
- For single compounds like cyclohexyl acetate, detailed chemical information is required.
-
Depth Requirement:
- Each section must be substantively filled, with a target word count for single compounds (~900-1400 words) and complex materials (~1100-1700 words).
- Missing data should be acknowledged with explanations or best-practice guidance.
-
Output Format:
- The entry should be structured with numbered headings and include a "Citation hooks:" line for each section, indicating sources to consult.
Sections to Include:
-
Identity & Chemical Information:
- Common names, IUPAC name, CAS number, FEMA number, molecular formula, and weight.
- Discussion on functional groups and structure-odor relevance.
-
Sensory Profile:
- Odor and flavor descriptors, thresholds, and typical sensory roles.
-
Natural Occurrence & Formation:
- Natural sources, formation pathways, and relevance to "natural" designations.
-
Use in Flavors:
- Flavor categories, functional roles, typical use levels in ppm, and stability considerations.
-
Use in Fragrances:
- Fragrance families, functional roles, concentration ranges, and volatility.
-
Regulatory Status (Regional Overview):
- Regulatory treatment in the US, EU, UK, Asia, and Latin America.
-
Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations:
- Safety in oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure contexts.
-
Practical Insights for Formulators:
- Value, synergies, pitfalls, and usage trends.
-
Confidence & Data Quality Notes:
- Summary of data quality and gaps.
-
QA Check:
- A checklist to ensure all sections are present and requirements are met.
Style & Constraints:
- The writing should be for experienced professionals, avoiding marketing language and focusing on interpretive insights.
This structured approach ensures that the entry is comprehensive, technically accurate, and useful for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry.
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-02-13 10:49:42 GMT (p2)
